From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26195 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2007 03:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 26184 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2007 03:00:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:00:27 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1675894uge for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.255.7 with SMTP id c7mr857266ugi.1196132424105; Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?78.130.102.147? ( [78.130.102.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23sm4663414ugd.2007.11.26.19.00.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:00:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <474B8846.2000601@portugalmail.pt> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:00:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.13pre) Gecko/20071023 Thunderbird/1.5.0.14pre Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] --enable-targets=all with 32-bit BFD References: <200711261530.lAQFUNYW002440@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200711261530.lAQFUNYW002440@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00500.txt.bz2 Hi Ulrich, Sorry for the delay, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Hi Pedro, > >> Ulrich Weigand wrote: >>> The following patch fixes this as well, by making sure that >>> only Cygwin core files are claimed as GDB_OSABI_CYGWIN. The >>> heuristic used is to check whether a ".reg" section of the >>> proper size exists. Could you verify whether Cygwin core >>> files are still recognized corwrectly with this patch? >> At least on my machine this requires dumper.exe (the >> tool that produces cygwin core dumps) from HEAD. >> Since I've written the original problem (wasn't really a >> problem then :-) ), if Pierre doesn't have a Cygwin HEAD >> build handy, I'll try to test that part of the patch >> tomorrow or the day after. > > Thanks for the offer; I'd appreciate if you could do that test! > Just did. Recognizing Cygwin core file still works fine from both i686-pc-cygwin and i686-pc-linux-gnu with that hunk applied. -- Pedro Alves