From: Lerele <lerele@champenstudios.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [gdbserver/win32] (4/11) New interrupting method
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47498E1A.5070101@champenstudios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4737B553.2040302@portugalmail.pt>
Pedro Alves escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the new method to stop the inferior, based on a mix of
> Leo's and mine patches. The idea is simple. Loop through all
> the inferior threads suspending them.
>
> This version doesn't contain the gdbserver priority handling,
> which means that there is a higher chance of the inferior
> breaking the method, since the operation is not atomic. For
> example by tweaking its own thread's priorities or if the
> inferior is calling ResumeThread in its own threads while
> gdbserver is stopping them.
>
> The next patch will minimize those chances, by elevating
> gdbserver's priority while stopping the inferior with
> this method.
>
> Leo, did I miss anything?
>
> Regtested on a local i686-pc-cygwin gdbserver.
>
> Cheers,
> Pedro Alves
>
>
>
>
I think this patch breaks interrupt functionality.
The function suspend_one_thread in the new patch does not seem to
retreive the thread context and sets the thread suspend count to 1, so
the next call to thread_rec that should happen in gdbserver will get
incorrect thread context.
My interrupt patch I sent initially used thread_rec to pause the child
threads, so get context should work here.
I think it's more correct anyway to use thread_rec everywhere so that
SuspendThread is centralized in one unique function.
Is this correct, or is there something I may have slipped reading your
patch?
Leo.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-25 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-12 2:07 Pedro Alves
2007-11-25 15:00 ` Lerele [this message]
2007-11-25 18:47 ` Pedro Alves
2007-11-25 20:39 ` Lerele
2007-12-01 18:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-12-03 3:53 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47498E1A.5070101@champenstudios.com \
--to=lerele@champenstudios.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox