From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7765 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2007 18:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 7757 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2007 18:32:56 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:32:52 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so2043802nfh for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr426436huf.1192645969116; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?62.169.93.13? ( [62.169.93.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g12sm8838388nfb.2007.10.17.11.32.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47165541.90206@portugalmail.pt> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:47:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: Joel Brobecker , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems References: <200710161823.l9GIN1Vu023163@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200710161823.l9GIN1Vu023163@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Joel Brobecker wrote: > >> I will double-check this when I get a chance, but I think the current >> patches should provide relatively complete support. From what I could >> tell, the "attach" feature might not be working (apparently, we need >> to define the "ATTACH_NO_WAIT" macro), and we have to implement IO >> redirection / process creation through a shell. I think these are >> the only two major features that we should be missing. > Attaching already works nicelly. > Doesn't Pedro's patch use nm-cygwin.h which defines ATTACH_NO_WAIT? > Yep. Cheers, Pedro Alves