On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 02:45:25PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I just don't see why it should care about Cygwin.  Why complicate the
> code with special case operations for cygwin when there is already a
> cygwin port?  I doubt that this version of gdb would correctly translate
> cygwin paths built into the executable so it seems like it would just
> be a basically unused feature.

You convinced me.

Following your remark:
  >There should be no cygwin accommodations in a pure windows port of gdb.

How about the attached?

Cheers,
Pedro Alves