From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27063 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2007 23:14:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 27055 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Oct 2007 23:14:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:14:25 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so924804uge for ; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.237.14 with SMTP id k14mr7182635ugh.1192403662977; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:14:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?88.210.73.207? ( [88.210.73.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d25sm4220410nfh.2007.10.14.16.14.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:14:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4712A2B9.1070101@portugalmail.pt> Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:29:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Support of gdb for Windows 64 native systems References: <20071013024116.GB29152@adacore.com> <20071013154715.GE29152@adacore.com> <4711021C.8010805@portugalmail.pt> <20071013205105.GA13789@adacore.com> <47114BB7.1000501@portugalmail.pt> <20071014051622.GC13789@adacore.com> <471200C5.6050609@portugalmail.pt> <20071014173921.GD11619@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <471259B2.6050808@portugalmail.pt> <20071014221603.GA13096@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20071014221603.GA13096@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 07:02:26PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>> + flags = DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS; >>>> + toexec = exec_file; >>> This doesn't seem right. You moved this setting outside of an if block >>> and didn't accommodate the else condition. >> I didn't move it. The if inside the __CYGWIN__ block sets TOEXEC in both >> branches. > > I'm talking about "flags". > Sorry, should have realized it. Maybe I'm too tired, but I really can't see what's not right :( Cheers, Pedro Alves