From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24180 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2007 09:59:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24164 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Oct 2007 09:59:21 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.186) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:59:17 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b11so415829nfh for ; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.200.20 with SMTP id x20mr4640312huf.1191578354736; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?62.169.107.171? ( [62.169.107.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 31sm6104805nfu.2007.10.05.02.59.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Oct 2007 02:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47060AD9.2070701@portugalmail.pt> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 09:59:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Stabs parsing regression from GDB 6.6 to GDB 6.6.90 References: <46F707C3.1090105@portugalmail.pt> <006101c7fe8b$70d5af70$52810e50$@u-strasbg.fr> <4053daab0709240321n40d7e3e0vc0f7d5567e990785@mail.gmail.com> <006701c7feae$fbb75850$f32608f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <46F8C1C8.7080608@portugalmail.pt> <46F9A061.2020909@portugalmail.pt> <001b01c805b5$ce7f0730$6b7d1590$@u-strasbg.fr> <20071003184156.GC4305@adacore.com> <20071003185126.GA1976@caradoc.them.org> <47040AD9.6000900@portugalmail.pt> <20071003214038.GA26617@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20071003214038.GA26617@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If no one objects, I'll approve such a reversion for the branch and > your patch for trunk. Give it a day or two in case someone else has > a better idea. > It will have to be more like 5 or 6, since I'm travelling until monday. Unless someone cares to take it over, of course. :-) Cheers, Pedro Alves