From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 0gUWNGYp/1/wAQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:58 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id C7A971EF80; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:58 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F2621EF78 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58E93939C08; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:09:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C58E93939C08 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1610557797; bh=a8yeCsMWuhKLb8Z+WjM5Zlv6xfnnLbLxn61LFWFHZtY=; h=Subject:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=aG1JRxy5Y1ioD10WPjmXXbtx9HY4umzUQQgNtOTa0HmX+YPf0TIms8DCOP+mWW2uR bTaWOAgULUlTLKO+qD1V9Y5OgOMYebouXuFfghqhkkxjlfNvcpBmufXSVDF7fDbChg rDxQVhA+ezPsL77hM+1ze5My3ckdlrtAoKCtWcnI= Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca (smtp.polymtl.ca [132.207.4.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 047603939C08 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:09:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 047603939C08 Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10DH9mT4018459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:53 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 10DH9mT4018459 Received: from [10.0.0.11] (192-222-157-6.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.157.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5745E1EF78; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [pushed] gdb: bool-ify users of file_is_auto_load_safe To: Christian Biesinger References: <20210113170131.1422268-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> Message-ID: <46f55e1d-5f9f-f621-fb17-217b7365b802@polymtl.ca> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:09:48 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Poly-FromMTA: (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) at Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:09:48 +0000 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2021-01-13 12:03 p.m., Christian Biesinger wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:01 PM Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches > wrote: >> - int is_safe, in_hash_table; >> + int in_hash_table; > > That sounds like a good candidate for bool-ification as well? > > Christian > Yes, why not. Simon