From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9300 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2017 22:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9288 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2017 22:20:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=jose, affiliation, Jose, Hx-languages-length:1083 X-HELO: mail-wm0-f51.google.com Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-wm0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:20:36 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id r190so8254590wme.1 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:20:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qxIZafahW0ss0K5hcikYAyb05rVZ6uEHRxGv1ZixMV0=; b=r6ZunCgUvAOdnQQKLtvIBezfHHGUqzUipJZK2xuX98Za32VlZQQHpb8/Up1y/surHY b+ild8wsc8KPHQxjJ7iF4pMUYwndA/27LvV9p2svoXW3hDt64++aCw/XEuL9nxycH31X qYm5ARYs7SjijikHF+/lIh4UBFwDNcdGAyFfOBz7hV4q19xR+YfCoywMK6xzZlkDiQ2y 2VSG7CsxviRwGMUg6yjlhbwC7LgLmohovEyqO52zslDBYzt25y0+WmQhGh9gZyeLJB0d 8MbXeNbJd9D+9c0R15Gcw4Xgo3FlqgRV5WAQg6p2zqhf+RDZ3N3wmItnQn2x9xu9tl3c t0aQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/58g0EH8GtZrTajIStHMNgcPRamwbe4BpNC+nOxgFZ33VcH+pzY mXmqgFnNey4ZsIez X-Received: by 10.28.50.195 with SMTP id y186mr14385148wmy.5.1492554036010; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:20:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([37.189.166.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b73sm614289wrd.29.2017.04.18.15.20.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb passes and returns incorrect values when dealing with small array on Sparc To: "Jose E. Marchesi" References: <1490804220-92717-1-git-send-email-vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com> <87zifdjti2.fsf@oracle.com> Cc: vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <46e1e493-e787-c4c2-e717-3619e5d9f5ee@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87zifdjti2.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 Hi Jose, On 04/18/2017 10:28 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > > Hi Pedro. > > Sorry for the delay. I think everyone was hoping that someone > that actually groks SPARC stuff would take a look at this. > I don't think we have any maintainer currently actively caring for > SPARC in particular. Maybe you guys (Oracle folks) could help > review each others' patches? I think that'd help get these > patches in quicker. > > We (the Oracle toolchain team) actually review the GDB patches > internally from a functional perspective before they are sent upstream. > > We can make it more explicit in our future submissions with a note in > the patch submission. Internal review is of course fine and appreciated, but I still think it better to do at least some of it in the open. With a bit of visible involvement, it'll be natural for one (or more) of you guys to end up being gdb/SPARC maintainer. (As you know, maintainership status is individual, not through affiliation.) Thanks, Pedro Alves