From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31453 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2007 10:17:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 31445 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Sep 2007 10:17:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:17:09 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so714740uge for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.248.5 with SMTP id v5mr1740312ugh.1190456222276; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:17:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?88.210.76.158? ( [88.210.76.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z40sm1511593ugc.2007.09.22.03.16.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46F4EB73.6090405@portugalmail.pt> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:17:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070728 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Stabs parsing regression from GDB 6.6 to GDB 6.6.90 References: <000e01c7fb9b$22e600f0$68b202d0$@u-strasbg.fr> <000601c7fc25$98110430$c8330c90$@u-strasbg.fr> <46F486B4.6050900@portugalmail.pt> <20070922042016.GC3963@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20070922042016.GC3963@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Just tested that it also fixes the problem. I'll give it a >> testsuite spin for C/C++ on Cygwin tomorrow, but the testcase >> that suposedly tests this is in ADA, which I don't have a >> setup for... > > Which testcase is this? I can give it a whirl and see what happens. > gdb.ada/fixed_points.exp Original patch: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00448.html Testcase: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/gdb-patches/2004-11/msg00467.html Cheers, Pedro Alves