Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Stabs parsing regression from GDB 6.6 to GDB 6.6.90
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:07:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F486B4.6050900@portugalmail.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000601c7fc25$98110430$c8330c90$@u-strasbg.fr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2191 bytes --]

Hi,

This afects Cygwin badly, as it still uses stabs by default.
I've seen this problem here, but thought it was caused by a
few gcc changes I was making ...

Pierre Muller wrote:
>   As I was unable to understand the current implementation of
> the twos_complement_representation

I can't really see how it was supposed to work either.
Parsing 000000000 is broken currently.

> I rewrote it almost completely.

You are only counting the bits.  This function should
return the parsed number if it fits in a long:

/* If TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS is set to a strictly positive value and if
     the number is represented in an octal representation, assume that
     it is represented in a 2's complement representation with a size of
     TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS.

     If the number fits in a long, set *BITS to 0 and return the value.
     If not, set *BITS to be the number of bits in the number and return 0.

     If encounter garbage, set *BITS to -1 and return 0.  */


>   The code now checks that the most significant
> bit of the whole octal representation of the huge number
> that is being parsed is exactly at the bit position given by
> the twos_complement_bits parameter.
> 

>   The attached patch (against 6.6.90 source)
> fixes the problem that I describe in the previous
> email. I get no complaint for the 'unsigned long long' type
> compiled with '-gstabs+' option.
> 

Thanks for pointing in the right direction!

(Forgive me for counter patching, but I had started on this
  here too yesterday :( )

What about the attached?  Isn't it simpler?

We get passed the max number of bits the number we're parsing
can hold in TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS.

Just parse the number as unsigned, if it overflows, it doesn't
matter, we just account for the bits.
If it doesn't overflow (host has a big long),
	and TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS < sizeof (long) * HOST_CHAR_BIT
	and number is signed according to TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS - 1
	bit being set, sign extend the number into a long.

Just tested that it also fixes the problem.  I'll give it a
testsuite spin for C/C++ on Cygwin tomorrow, but the testcase
that suposedly tests this is in ADA, which I don't have a
setup for...

Cheers,
Pedro Alves



[-- Attachment #2: stabsread.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 2477 bytes --]

2007-09-22  Pedro Alves  <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>

	* stabsread.c (read_huge_number): Remove special parsing of octal
	two's complement representation.  If just parsed a negative number
	in octal two's complement representation, sign extend the result
	to a long.

Index: stabsread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/stabsread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -p -r1.95 stabsread.c
--- stabsread.c	10 Aug 2007 22:08:22 -0000	1.95
+++ stabsread.c	22 Sep 2007 02:28:15 -0000
@@ -3737,32 +3737,9 @@ read_huge_number (char **pp, int end, in
     {
       if (n <= upper_limit)
         {
-          if (twos_complement_representation)
-            {
-              /* Octal, signed, twos complement representation. In this case,
-                 sn is the signed value, n is the corresponding absolute
-                 value. signed_bit is the position of the sign bit in the
-                 first three bits.  */
-              if (sn == 0)
-                {
-                  sign_bit = (twos_complement_bits % 3 + 2) % 3;
-                  sn = c - '0' - ((2 * (c - '0')) | (2 << sign_bit));
-                }
-              else
-                {
-                  sn *= radix;
-                  sn += c - '0';
-                }
-
-              if (sn < 0)
-                n = -sn;
-            }
-          else
-            {
-              /* unsigned representation */
-              n *= radix;
-              n += c - '0';		/* FIXME this overflows anyway */
-            }
+	  /* unsigned representation */
+	  n *= radix;
+	  n += c - '0';		/* FIXME this overflows anyway */
         }
       else
         overflow = 1;
@@ -3823,7 +3800,25 @@ read_huge_number (char **pp, int end, in
       if (bits)
 	*bits = 0;
       if (twos_complement_representation)
-        return sn;
+	{
+	  if (nbits == twos_complement_bits)
+	    {
+	      /* N is signed.  TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS may be less than
+		 what fits in a long.  Since we can't assume a host
+		 with two's complement long, extract the module value
+		 of N, and multiply it with -1.
+
+		 eg: with TWOS_COMPLEMENT_BITS == 16, and sizeof long == 32,
+		 0x00008111 => 0xffff7eef => 0x00007eef => 0xffff8111.  */
+
+	      unsigned long l = (unsigned long) n;
+	      l = ~l + 1;
+	      l &= (1L << twos_complement_bits) - 1;
+	      l *= -1;
+	      n = l;
+	    }
+	  return n;
+	}
       else
         return n * sign;
     }


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-22  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <000e01c7fb9b$22e600f0$68b202d0$@u-strasbg.fr>
2007-09-21  8:01 ` Pierre Muller
2007-09-22  3:07   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2007-09-22  4:20     ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-22 10:17       ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-22 19:39     ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-22 22:58       ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-22 23:08         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-23  1:17           ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-23 10:17             ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-23 11:39           ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-23 12:42             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-09-23 13:57               ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-24  0:43       ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-24  9:15         ` Pierre Muller
2007-09-24 10:21           ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-24 13:30             ` Pierre Muller
2007-09-25  8:09               ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-25 23:58                 ` Pedro Alves
2007-10-03 12:06                   ` Pierre Muller
2007-10-03 16:43                     ` Jim Blandy
2007-10-03 18:44                     ` Joel Brobecker
2007-10-03 18:51                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-03 19:07                         ` Joel Brobecker
2007-10-03 21:36                         ` Pedro Alves
2007-10-03 21:40                           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-10-05  9:59                             ` Pedro Alves
2007-10-08 23:26                               ` Pedro Alves
2007-10-09  9:10                                 ` Pierre Muller
2007-10-09 11:39                                   ` Pedro Alves
2007-09-23  1:06     ` Joel Brobecker
2007-09-24  6:57     ` Pierre Muller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F486B4.6050900@portugalmail.pt \
    --to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox