Hi,

Daniel Jacobowitz schrieb:
> 
>> 3) Should the used addresses in the testcase be changed to, for example,
>>   0x10000 and 0x20000? This would work for SPU, too. Or shall I introduce
>>   variables for this addresses and set them to a range < SPU_LS_SIZE for
>>   SPU targets only?
> 
> I think changing the addresses is fine.
> 

attached is the original patch for address wrapping in SPU plus a change of the addresses
in gdb.cp/cp-relocate.exp to match size of SPU Local Store.

This patch showed no regression on SPU-

ChangeLog gdb/: 

	* spu-tdep.c (spu_pointer_to_address): New function.
	(spu_integer_to_address): Likewise.
	(spu_gdbarch_init): Add spu_pointer_to_address and 
	spu_integer_to_address to gdbarch.


ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/:

	* gdb.cp/cp-relocate.exp (add-symbol-file): Change addresses
	to fit into SPU Local Store memory.


Is this ok ?

-- 
Markus Deuling
GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE
deuling@de.ibm.com