From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19169 invoked by alias); 12 Jul 2007 11:30:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 18973 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jul 2007 11:30:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:30:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6CBTxCd001019; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:29:59 -0400 Received: from pobox.fab.redhat.com (pobox.fab.redhat.com [10.33.63.12]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6CBTwOI030480; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:29:58 -0400 Received: from [10.33.6.14] (vpn-6-14.fab.redhat.com [10.33.6.14]) by pobox.fab.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l6CBTshl023133; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:29:54 -0400 Message-ID: <469610A7.6010806@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:30:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geoffrey Keating CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Changing top level files and include/ files over to GPLv3 References: <4695FF08.5060204@redhat.com> <251ADF2B-503D-4A80-BB45-D076559E6CC6@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <251ADF2B-503D-4A80-BB45-D076559E6CC6@apple.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 Hi Geoff, > I think your copy is out-of-date, especially if it doesn't have a '2007' > in the copyright years. Ah, yes, so it was. I am very sorry about that. >>> I presume this will include files licensed with an exception, >> I had intended to files with license exceptions, but that has now changed. The GCC Steering Committee has decided to leave such files alone (for now), so I will not change them. > It would be helpful to post the wording that is being considered. Umm, do you mean the wording that the GCC Steering committee is considering to use as replacement text in files which currently use the GPLv2 (or LGPLv2) but which also have an exception ? If so, then I am sorry but I cannot help you. I do not know what wording they are considering. I am sure that you can ask them though. Cheers Nick