From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12832 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 23:20:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12813 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jun 2007 23:20:36 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (HELO mu-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.134.184) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:20:33 +0000 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g7so1899578muf for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr13658146buc.1182813631009; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:20:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?88.210.69.107? ( [88.210.69.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5sm2593790nfh.2007.06.25.16.20.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46804DAD.4020309@portugalmail.pt> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:40:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070509 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: insight@sourceware.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch ping^2] suppress annoying warnings about cygwin1.dbg References: <46262D3A.8B1A0D15@dessent.net> <20070418150137.GA7338@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <46263710.D9755DAD@dessent.net> <462639F3.FBCF4675@dessent.net> <46264A56.BA86EED7@dessent.net> <4638AB6B.5AA94B26@dessent.net> <46803846.F99470AE@dessent.net> In-Reply-To: <46803846.F99470AE@dessent.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2 Hi Brian, Brian Dessent wrote: > Patch here: http://sourceware.org/ml/insight/2007-q2/msg00020.html > > Can anyone please take a look at this? Using insight on Cygwin without > this is a very frustrating affair which involves having to dismiss *two* > stupid focus-stealing pop-up dialogs every single time you type 'run'. > I can't test it right now, but, Doesn't that warning about the missing .text section come from win32-nat.c falling back to .text to compute the relocation offsets, and not finding any .text section? I think the changes to make win32 use solib-target.c at least will turn this into a different warning, if they don't remove it. I'm not familiar with the separate debug info mechanism in gdb, but to me it sounds we should understand the reasons for the warnings and fix it there. I mean, why is it that these warnings don't happen on other targets? Why is gdb looking for loadable sections in a debug info only file? Cheers, Pedro Alves