From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17612 invoked by alias); 25 May 2007 17:43:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 17507 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2007 17:43:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.lu.unisi.ch (HELO smtp.lu.unisi.ch) (195.176.178.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 17:43:42 +0000 Received: from mail.lu.unisi.ch ([195.176.178.40]) by smtp.lu.unisi.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 25 May 2007 19:42:57 +0200 Received: from scientist.local ([213.140.22.65] RDNS failed) by mail.lu.unisi.ch over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 25 May 2007 19:45:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4657204A.9010301@lu.unisi.ch> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 17:43:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini Reply-To: bonzini@gnu.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Tobler CC: Mike Stump , libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm, Steve Ellcey , jjohnstn@redhat.com, bonzini@gnu.org, newlib@sourceware.org, aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, Peter O'Gorman Subject: Re: New libtool is in the GCC and Src trees. References: <200705242032.NAA13355@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <1180041270.4254.1191675307@webmail.messagingengine.com> <916D5267-3B4D-42E3-99C4-CD9A7228D466@apple.com> <46571EEE.6000809@pop.agri.ch> In-Reply-To: <46571EEE.6000809@pop.agri.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 > /head/testbin-single/lib/libltdl.3.dylib -Wl,-compatibility_version > -Wl,5 -Wl,-current_version -Wl,5.1 > /usr/bin/ld: unknown flag: -compatibility_version > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > And Paolo, your suggestion doesn't work. Same error. > > So, do I follow correctly to put my patch into ltmain.sh on gcc? Go ahead (gcc and src), remembering it is a temporary measure. Peter said he'd look at it in the weekend. (I'll be offline for the whole weekend instead) Paolo