From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14316 invoked by alias); 9 May 2007 11:43:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14306 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2007 11:43:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate5.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.154) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2007 11:43:16 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l49BhDLq268360 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 11:43:13 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l49BhDwn3674276 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 13:43:13 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l49BhCNR005878 for ; Wed, 9 May 2007 13:43:13 +0200 Received: from [9.152.248.44] ([9.152.248.44]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l49BhBkr005860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 9 May 2007 13:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4641B37C.10608@de.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 11:43:00 -0000 From: Markus Deuling User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand , Daniel Jacobowitz , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [rfc]: Fix gdb.base/gcore.exp References: <463A1707.9070801@de.ibm.com> <200705081826.l48IQsER008805@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070508183745.GA22191@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070508183745.GA22191@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 08:26:54PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> What output do you get that runs into neither of the two >> tested patterns? > > FWIW, while Alan had core files broken because of the > segment-in-section change, I encountered the same TCL error. > I cannot reproduce it with current head :-( There was an error in creating that core file. For my opinion that variable should be initialized in every case. The testcase should return a FAIL if GDB's output doesn't match the reg exp but not exit with an error. global core_supported if {!$core_supported} { return -1 } However, this testcase runs without error now. Thanks for your effort. -- Markus Deuling GNU Toolchain for Linux on Cell BE deuling@de.ibm.com