From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27329 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2009 03:02:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27205 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jul 2009 03:01:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (HELO web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.26.174) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:01:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 15457 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jul 2009 03:01:52 -0000 Message-ID: <461488.15444.qm@web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Received: from [124.125.223.141] by web112514.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:01:52 PDT Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:02:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Michael Snyder MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 Hi, I am bit relieved to see humble explanation from your side. I was not aware of the things which you have mentioned.=20 As I am excited about contribution, I sounded bit hurrying : ) I am sorry for any inconvenience caused. I will made sure that the test which testes the patch, goes into gdb testsu= ite. Regards, Oza. --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Michael Snyder wrote: > From: Michael Snyder > Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch > To: "paawan oza" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:20 AM > paawan oza wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been waiting long for the first patch to go. > > I have bee trying hard to give explanations and > include review comments if any. > > I request, please review the patch and provide your > acceptance. > > It would be nice to see myself contributing in > reversible as much as possible. > >=20 > > the questions asked by Hui, have already been > clarified. > > please see the below mail. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Oza. >=20 > Hi Oza, >=20 > I know you have been waiting a long time, and I > appologize. > It is unfortunate that some submissions take a long time > to > review, but you are not being singled out.=A0 It took > over a > year for Teawater's process record patches to get into > gdb. >=20 > I certainly hope that it will take less than that for > yours, > but please remember that the volunteer maintainers here > all > have full time jobs with their own priorities and > deadlines. >=20 > We're doing the best we can. >=20 > Michael >=20 >=20