From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12109 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 20:37:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 12087 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 20:37:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt (HELO elrond.portugalmail.pt) (195.245.179.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:37:45 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id A314F43849; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:36:00 +0100 (WEST) Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elrond.portugalmail.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUrGKeNfwvcA; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:36:00 +0100 (WEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (62.169.92.216.rev.optimus.pt [62.169.92.216]) (Authenticated sender: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E57438B8; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:35:52 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <460C238A.1070403@portugalmail.pt> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:37:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Denis PILAT CC: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> In-Reply-To: <460BD630.20709@st.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000728-2, 28-03-2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 Denis PILAT escreveu: > On my native linux gdb, I get "warning: Signal ? does not exist on > this system." when running. > It's just a missing line in the configure of gdb. > Attach is a patch that fixes it: > Dough! Sorry, it was me. A testsuite gdb.sum diff didn't catch it on Cygwin, probably because (almost) all signal tests fail on Cygwin anyway. Cheers, Pedro Alves