From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17810 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 03:18:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17791 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 03:18:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt (HELO elrond.portugalmail.pt) (195.245.179.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:18:24 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685B542A74; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:16:39 +0100 (WEST) Received: from elrond.portugalmail.pt ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elrond.portugalmail.pt [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvU7E5kLILP7; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 04:16:38 +0100 (WEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (62.169.107.177.rev.optimus.pt [62.169.107.177]) (Authenticated sender: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt) by elrond.portugalmail.pt (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7BF440EA; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:43:03 +0100 (WEST) Message-ID: <460AEFC7.6030707@portugalmail.pt> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 03:18:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [New WinCE support] [patch 4/4] The bulk of the code. References: <20070315235008.243411000@portugalmail.pt> <45F9FC33.9020106@portugalmail.pt> <4053daab0703160803s3edf1294sfcdf4f8319787ab7@mail.gmail.com> <45FDE45F.2000309@portugalmail.pt> <20070327192032.GJ28164@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070327192032.GJ28164@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000728-2, 28-03-2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 01:16:15AM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> ChangeLog >> * wince.c: Remove. >> * wince-stub.h: Remove. >> * wince-stub.c: Remove. Humm, these files are still used by the current sh and mips WinCE ports. As I understand it, those ports are scheduled for removal. I'll post a separate patch to remove them all. > This is OK. Doesn't it deserve a NEWS entry? > Thanks a bunch! I'll prepare a NEWS entry separately. > I didn't go over the Windows-specific changes too closely; I trust you > :-) I'll try not to break it too badly when working on the Linux ports. > > Thanks for the trust :) I've tried to make sure I didn't break Cygwin gdbserver in the process. >> @@ -52,8 +52,14 @@ case "${target}" in >> srv_linux_regsets=yes >> srv_linux_thread_db=yes >> ;; >> + arm*-*-mingw32ce*) srv_regobj=reg-arm.o >> + srv_tgtobj="win32-low.o win32-arm-low.o" >> + srv_tgtobj="${srv_tgtobj} wincecompat.o" >> + srv_mingw=yes >> + srv_mingwce=yes >> + ;; >> i[34567]86-*-mingw*) srv_regobj=reg-i386.o >> - srv_tgtobj="win32-low.o" >> + srv_tgtobj="win32-low.o win32-i386-low.o" >> srv_mingw=yes >> ;; >> ia64-*-linux*) srv_regobj=reg-ia64.o >> > > Please put arm*-*-mingw32ce* up higher, near other ARM targets - the > case statement is pretty much sorted. > > Ok, I'll do that. > Should you check arm-wince-pe here too, since you did in the directory > above? Not that I expect a lot of native arm-wince-pe gdb :-) I don't think so. arm-wince-pe is supposed (at least that is what I get from the binutils archives from the time Nick made the original binutils/gcc wince support, and from current FSF arm-wince-pe-gcc) to use MSFT's headers and libs, and as such will not be able to build gdbserver OOTB. Nevertheless, it should be possible to have an arm-wince-pe-gdb connect to a arm-wince-mingw32ce-gdbserver. Cheers, Pedro Alves