From: Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] gdb/python: add gdbpy_dict_wrapper:allocate_dict helper
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 12:03:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45f50ab7-c1c8-4626-ba90-08b6f854ba6d@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bjh4rcja.fsf@tromey.com>
On 03/03/2026 18:30, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> Matthieu Longo <matthieu.longo@arm.com> writes:
>
>> Python extension objects that support __dict__ must inherit from
>> gdbpy_dict_wrapper, a wrapper class that stores the PyObject
>> corresponding to the __dict__ attribute.
>
>> Currently, management of this dictionary is not centralized, and
>> each Python extension object implements its own logic to create,
>> access, and destroy it.
>
>> This patch focuses on the allocation of the dictionary, introduces
>> a new helper function, gdbpy_dict_wrapper::allocate_dict(), and
>> adapts the existing code to use the helper.
>
>> + if (! gdbpy_dict_wrapper::allocate_dict (object))
>> return nullptr;
>
> gdb style doesn't put a space after '!' in an expression.
> There's a few instances of this.
>
Fixed.
>> +
>> + template <class T>
>> + static bool
>> + allocate_dict (gdbpy_ref<T>& self)
>
> Space before "&"
>
>> + {
>> + static_assert (std::is_base_of_v<gdbpy_dict_wrapper, T>
>> + || std::is_same_v<PyObject, T>);
>> + auto *obj = static_cast<gdbpy_dict_wrapper *> (self.get ());
>> + obj->dict = PyDict_New ();
>> + return obj->dict != nullptr;
>
> It seems to me that if this were a non-static method, then it also would
> not have to be a template method, like
>
> bool allocate_dict ()
> {
> // maybe? gdb_assert (dict == nullptr);
> dict = PyDict_New ();
> return dict != nullptr;
> }
>
> The idea being that inheritance takes care of the details, so this
> works:
>
> gdbpy_ref<field_object> blah;
> if (blah->allocate_dict ()) ...
>
> Unless we have a case where this is needed for plain gdbpy_ref<>?
> But based on an earlier patch I would think that's not possible.
>
> Tom
You are right, I needlessly overcomplicated things.
There is no case where this is needed for plain gdbpy_ref<>.
The approach with the inheritance is simpler and cleaner.
Regarding the assertion "gdb_assert (dict == nullptr);", it seems that PyObject_New() does not zero the memory so the assertion can be randomly triggered by garbage. I won't keep it.
Fixed in the next revision.
Matthieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-06 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 16:16 [PATCH v2 0/9] gdb: more fixes for Python limited C API support Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] gdb: switch tuple object helpers to Python limited API equivalents Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:09 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] gdb: introduce rgb_color type to simplify existing code Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:16 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-04 16:30 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] gdb: switch bytes object helpers to Python limited API equivalents Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] gdb: add new helpers for retrieving a type's fully qualified name Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:59 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-06 17:49 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-06 19:45 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] gdb/python: allow ref_ptr<T, Policy>::new_reference to accept subclasses of T Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:18 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-04 16:56 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-04 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-06 11:37 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-06 11:43 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-06 16:47 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-09 11:38 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] gdb/python: flatten functions calling PyObject_New and use gdbpy_ref Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:22 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-09 11:41 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:22 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] gdb/python: accept gdbpy_ref in init helpers and return bool Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:24 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-09 13:25 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] gdb/python: add gdbpy_dict_wrapper:allocate_dict helper Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 18:30 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-06 12:03 ` Matthieu Longo [this message]
2026-03-03 16:16 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] gdb/python: add accessor helpers for __dict__ in Python extension objects Matthieu Longo
2026-03-03 19:02 ` Tom Tromey
2026-03-06 14:33 ` Matthieu Longo
2026-03-06 16:04 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45f50ab7-c1c8-4626-ba90-08b6f854ba6d@arm.com \
--to=matthieu.longo@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox