From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removal of uses of MAX_REGISTER_SIZE
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 12:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45e3a5e1-a9aa-1bc0-5d08-526b89fc458e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7CF07197-4FED-4970-BB4B-2FE828E29A63@arm.com>
On 01/24/2017 10:31 AM, Alan Hayward wrote:
> aarch64_pseudo_write (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
> int regnum, const gdb_byte *buf)
> {
> - gdb_byte reg_buf[MAX_REGISTER_SIZE];
> + gdb_byte *reg_buf = (gdb_byte *) alloca (register_size (gdbarch, regnum));
>
> /* Ensure the register buffer is zero, we want gdb writes of the
> various 'scalar' pseudo registers to behavior like architectural
> writes, register width bytes are written the remainder are set to
> zero. */
> - memset (reg_buf, 0, sizeof (reg_buf));
> + memset (reg_buf, 0, sizeof (register_size (gdbarch, regnum)));
OK, I scrolled a bit further down to the third hunk. This sizeof is
clearly broken. There may be more instances of this.
Makes me wonder whether this is the right approach. :-/
(No, I don't have a formed opinion for what that would be.)
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-27 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 10:31 Alan Hayward
2017-01-27 11:49 ` Pedro Alves
2017-01-27 12:11 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2017-01-27 16:46 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-01 15:49 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-01 12:45 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-01 15:48 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-02 9:40 ` Joel Brobecker
2017-02-03 9:59 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-03 10:28 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-03 11:00 ` Pedro Alves
2017-02-03 11:25 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-03 16:50 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-06 9:33 ` Alan Hayward
[not found] ` <20170206152635.GE11916@E107787-LIN>
2017-02-07 16:33 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-08 10:47 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-08 14:17 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-08 12:06 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-08 12:24 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-08 14:44 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-18 23:19 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-20 11:19 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-08 17:10 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-09 13:26 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-14 11:24 ` Alan Hayward
2017-02-08 17:36 ` Yao Qi
2017-02-13 11:59 ` Alan Hayward
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45e3a5e1-a9aa-1bc0-5d08-526b89fc458e@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=Alan.Hayward@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox