From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1837 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2007 18:33:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1826 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2007 18:33:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hq.tensilica.com (HELO mailapp.tensilica.com) (65.205.227.29) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:33:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mailapp.tensilica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HHlPq-0006wu-It; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:33:10 -0800 Received: from mailapp.tensilica.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailapp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25220-07; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:33:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from maxim_fc5.hq.tensilica.com ([192.168.11.68]) by mailapp.tensilica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HHlPp-0006rR-L1; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:33:09 -0800 Message-ID: <45D4A765.9070506@hq.tensilica.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:33:00 -0000 From: Maxim Grigoriev User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Grigoriev , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: Xtensa patch References: <45D3A6ED.40109@hq.tensilica.com> <20070215150939.GA20672@caradoc.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20070215150939.GA20672@caradoc.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 Thanks much for your comments, Daniel. Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 04:18:53PM -0800, Maxim Grigoriev wrote: > >> 2007-02-14 Maxim Grigoriev >> > What about it - are you asking for approval, planning to commit it, > etc? I'm planning to commit it. My understanding is the Xtensa-related stuff does not need an approval, if it comes from me, Does it ? I think asking people to take a look at any update is always a good idea. > I found this message a little mysterious :-) I'm guessing these > are fixes for building with a newer GCC. > Exactly. > I have only one comment - it might help to use a mailer which does not > mangle patches. Something's eaten the leading whitespace, probably > format=flowed Let me find out how I can fix it for the future. Most likely, this formatting problem came up together with a newer complier after my desktop was upgraded to GNU/Linux FC5. I'm using Thunderbird. Thanks ! -- Maxim