Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 04:57:50PM +0100, Denis PILAT wrote:
>   
>> Your remarks have been taken into account into the attached patch.
>> Are you ok for committing this one plus the previous patch regarding the 
>> thread.c ?
>> (Frederic Riss will do that for me)
>>     
>
> Yes, that's OK (with a minor fix, below).  Let me know if you would
> like write access yourself.
>   
Yes thanks.
> Checking for $[specific number] should be avoided, because adding more
> tests earlier in the file will break it.  Use \\\$\[0-9]+ instead.
>
>   
I prefer that as well, therefore I changed the previous test as well to 
keep the same style (see attached file).

-- 
Denis