From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6074 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2007 16:54:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 5910 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2007 16:54:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from server.usilu.net (HELO mail.usilu.net) (195.176.178.200) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:54:33 +0000 Received: from [1.240.182.245] ([213.140.22.65] RDNS failed) by mail.usilu.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:54:29 +0100 Message-ID: <45BF783F.8010008@lu.unisi.ch> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:54:00 -0000 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Schwab CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Substitute LDFLAGS in toplevel makefile References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Is there any reason not to substitute LDFLAGS in the toplevel makefile? > It is already a standard autoconf substitution. Ok if nobody objects in 24 hours. Paolo