From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27010 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2007 07:25:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26963 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Jan 2007 07:25:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lon-del-03.spheriq.net (HELO lon-del-03.spheriq.net) (195.46.50.99) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:32 +0000 Received: from lon-out-02.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.130]) by lon-del-03.spheriq.net with ESMTP id l0Q7PSRn017266 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:28 GMT Received: from lon-cus-02.spheriq.net (lon-cus-02.spheriq.net [195.46.50.38]) by lon-out-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id l0Q7PQlo021979 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:28 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by lon-cus-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id l0Q7PONF014073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:25 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C6EE2DA41; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.cro.st.com (mail1.cro.st.com [164.129.40.131]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 6D28F4726C; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.44.95] (crx595.cro.st.com [164.129.44.95]) by mail1.cro.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CJM95791 (AUTH "denis pilat"); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:25:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45B9ACDA.60409@st.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:25:00 -0000 From: Denis PILAT User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Ris?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?s?= , Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed References: <45B60056.6030704@st.com> <20070123124457.GA1600@nevyn.them.org> <45B61B41.90509@st.com> <17847.54349.654238.452957@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <1169676493.5160.14.camel@funkylaptop> <17847.56114.220249.307621@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070125024118.GA10014@nevyn.them.org> <17849.6124.750912.589862@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <17849.6124.750912.589862@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00529.txt.bz2 Nick Roberts wrote: > In any > case, it can segfault if you edit the source file and recompile before > (re)starting execution, so some change is necessary. > > It can segfault just by using the command "file" on an other binary file before starting the execution, and that is a more common feature if we consider that gdb must not be killed and restarted to debug a new program. -- Denis