From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46573-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 10936 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2006 17:24:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 10894 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 17:24:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (195.23.133.218)   by sourceware.org with QMTP; 10 Dec 2006 17:24:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 12323 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 17:23:59 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mailfrt08.isp.novis.pt) ([195.23.133.200])           (envelope-sender <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>)           by mailrly08.isp.novis.pt with compressed SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 17:23:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 18879 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2006 17:23:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([195.23.225.203])           (envelope-sender <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>)           by mailfrt08.isp.novis.pt with SMTP; 10 Dec 2006 17:23:57 -0000
Message-ID: <457C42B0.9030703@portugalmail.pt>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 17:24:00 -0000
From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061025 Thunderbird/1.5.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFH] Cygwin (EXEEXT) fix.
References: <457C1BBA.8020802@portugalmail.pt> <20061210155602.GA22340@nevyn.them.org> <457C3BA2.3010801@portugalmail.pt> <20061210170632.GA24268@nevyn.them.org>
In-Reply-To: <20061210170632.GA24268@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0655-1, 08-12-2006), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00154.txt.bz2

Daniel Jacobowitz escreveu:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2006 at 04:53:54PM +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
>   
>> Ah, I see. But shouldn't a command work too?
>> If not, then I don't understand is how this in
>> gdb.arch/altivec-regs.exp can work.
>>
>> gdb_expect_list "info vector" ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
>> [$pattern0]
>> [$pattern1]
>> [$pattern2]
>> [$pattern3]
>> (...)
>> }
>>     
>
> I don't know how it's supposed to work either.  That's not valid
> commands anyway.
>
>
>   
Thanks, I'll be able to sleep again :)
 From what I saw when trying to do the same thing on annota3.exp, I 
guess those tests will
always yield false positives.

Cheers,
Pedro Alves