From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5666 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2006 21:18:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 5652 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2006 21:18:10 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from hq.tensilica.com (HELO mailapp.tensilica.com) (65.205.227.29) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mailapp.tensilica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GZwK2-0007SI-KC; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:18:02 -0700 Received: from mailapp.tensilica.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailapp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28511-02; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.hq.tensilica.com ([192.168.11.123]) by mailapp.tensilica.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GZwK2-0007SD-Au; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:18:02 -0700 Received: from [192.168.11.123] (heron.hq.tensilica.com [192.168.11.123]) by heron.hq.tensilica.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59355AC258; Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4535488A.3060705@tensilica.com> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:18:00 -0000 From: Bob Wilson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [doc/commit] Re: fix use of @kbd and @key in gdb.texinfo References: <452BECD7.4010402@tensilica.com> <20061015213827.GA27170@nevyn.them.org> <4533C78B.10800@tensilica.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-10/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> What about the TUI chapter? There are lots of "C-" prefixes in there and it's >> not tied to Emacs users. Should they all use "Ctrl-"? > > I left "C-" there because the text mentions the corresponding Emacs > keybindings. But I'm open to other opinions. Sounds good enough. I just wanted to make sure that it was intentional. >> Also, I noticed that there is a mix of upper- and lowercase for Ctrl key >> combinations, e.g, "Ctrl-C" vs. "Ctrl-c". Can we make them all the same? > > The latter should be used in @kbd, the former in @samp. If this is > so, it's deliberate: @kbd shows what one types, @samp shows what's > displayed on the screen as the result. AFAIK, you always get Ctrl-C > (uppercase C) when you interrupt a process. OK. I wasn't aware of that distinction, but it makes sense and it looks to me like the doc is now consistently following that rule. --Bob