Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands

Joel Brobecker
2006-07-10T21:56:34Z

> FWIW, this version of the interface is fine with me (I didn't look at
> the code). I strongly agree with Andrew that we should support more
> than one substitution rule, but we can do that separately.

I have no problem with that, the interface is extensible in that way.
In terms of implementation, I should have more time for that in the
fall.

--
Joel