Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-10T21:51:21Z

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:47:06PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > This version is okay to go in, provided that you fix these small
> > gotchas:
>
> Great! I made the adjustments you suggested, thanks!
>
> Just to be safe, you have approved both documentation and code,
> right? I assume this because you also made some comments about
> the code, and some of them were technical. I'll commit as soon
> as this is confirmed.

FWIW, this version of the interface is fine with me (I didn't look at
the code). I strongly agree with Andrew that we should support more
than one substitution rule, but we can do that separately.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery