Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands

Joel Brobecker
2006-07-06T04:47:38Z

> Given your later explanation that you only support one entry, I find
> "substitute-path add" a bit confusing. Shall we take a moment to think
> about a general interface for lists?
>
> If we had one, we could use it for other variables, and we could access
> this using something like -gdb-set.

Would you mind making a design proposal? I'm not sure to understand
what you exactly you are thinking about. I think I understand the fact
that you would like to have more than one rule because "add" doesn't
suggest "replace", but I am not sure I get the rest :-/.

Thanks,
--
Joel