Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands

Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-07-10T21:58:44Z

On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:56:30PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > FWIW, this version of the interface is fine with me (I didn't look at
> > the code). I strongly agree with Andrew that we should support more
> > than one substitution rule, but we can do that separately.
>
> I have no problem with that, the interface is extensible in that way.
> In terms of implementation, I should have more time for that in the
> fall.

I will hopefully take care of it before then.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery