From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1085 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 23:55:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1069 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:54:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (195.23.133.211) by sourceware.org with QMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:54:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 25493 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailfrt09.isp.novis.pt) ([195.23.133.201]) (envelope-sender ) by mailrly01.isp.novis.pt with compressed SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:54:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 7953 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:54:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mamas-laptop) ([195.23.225.239]) (envelope-sender ) by mailfrt09.isp.novis.pt with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:54:53 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mamas-laptop with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id J16NRC-000330-KW; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:54:48 +0100 Message-ID: <44988AC7.2050002@portugalmail.pt> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:55:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support update. References: <44969E63.9050208@portugalmail.pt> <20060620200901.GA28807@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20060620201214.GA1278@nevyn.them.org> <44988631.3010606@portugalmail.pt> <20060620233616.GA14473@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060620233616.GA14473@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-3, 20-06-2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 12:35:13AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> Anyway, for reference, can you point to any gdbserver/remote stub effort >> for win32 (other than gdbproxy)? >> There doesn't seem to be anything of the sort in gdb/ >> > > This is totally my fault. A win32 gdbserver was contributed (off-list) > a while ago; I am going to be merging it in for the next release of > GDB, I hope. I just keep getting too busy. > > Nice. I'm looking forward to that, then. Cheers, Pedro Alves