From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14687 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 23:27:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14618 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:27:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (195.23.133.212) by sourceware.org with QMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:27:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 9662 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:27:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailfrt09.isp.novis.pt) ([195.23.133.201]) (envelope-sender ) by mailrly02.isp.novis.pt with compressed SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 14133 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2006 23:27:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mamas-laptop) ([195.23.225.239]) (envelope-sender ) by mailfrt09.isp.novis.pt with SMTP; 20 Jun 2006 23:27:03 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mamas-laptop with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id J16MGX-000584-FT; Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: <44988440.6090901@portugalmail.pt> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: me@cgf.cx Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support update. References: <44969E63.9050208@portugalmail.pt> <20060620200901.GA28807@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20060620200901.GA28807@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0625-3, 20-06-2006), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 01:53:55PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > As the original author of the wince.c and wince-stub.c files, I hate to > say this, but I don't think they are really the right way to have > implemented things. It probably would have been better to have just > ported gdbserver to the CE device. > > Also, I really don't want to pollute the win32-nat.c file with CE > accommodations. That would again make me the de facto maintainer of > Windows CE - a role from which which I've previously abdicated. > > So, thanks very much for the patch. It was obviously a lot of work but > I really don't want to do things this way. > > cgf > > I understand your position, and I was expecting this reaction. Maybe if I find some time I will try to write the proper remote win32 support into gdb. In the mean time, there are a ton of other things left to do, so I am just happy that I have gdb working correctly for WinCE target. I will maintain this patch out of tree on http://cegcc.berlios.de for now. The solib.c/solist.h part of the patch should be generic, though. Would you like me to submit it separately? Cheers, Pedro Alves