From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, schwab@suse.de
Subject: Re: [m68k] return values
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4496C2AF.2000906@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200606191510.k5JFAfG0028604@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Well, I fear you've managed to confuse yourself. The current m68k
> default target uses m68k_extract_return_value(), which reads all
> return values from %d0.
you're right. ok, the whole problem I'm trying to solve is to get the function
return working for m68k-elf. That appears to be a mixture of original and svr4
features. Namely:
a) returns always go in %d0 (original)
b) small structures can be passed in registers (svr4)
c) structure return values use the struct_return convention (svr4?)
What approach do you think would be best in tackling this? The way I'd gone at
it was to treat the m68k-elf as a variant of svr4 (i.e. #a was the exceptional
behaviour). It would be possible to organize it as original ABI, but with #b &
#c as the exceptions.
Do you think the default should be compatible with m68k-elf, or should the user
explicitly set the abi in that case?
As you may be aware, #b is implemented by GCC in a horrible way that is
dependent on internal implementation details -- it's not just that the structure
is 'small' or even 2^n bytes. I have a patch that emulate's GCC's behaviour,
and I was going to post that after this patch was resolved.
It certainly is an adventure trying to figure out what's meant to happen :)
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-19 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-09 13:05 Nathan Sidwell
2006-06-18 1:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-06-18 5:51 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-06-19 14:39 ` Nathan Sidwell
2006-06-19 15:12 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-06-19 15:28 ` Nathan Sidwell [this message]
2006-06-19 18:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2006-06-22 11:02 ` Nathan Sidwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4496C2AF.2000906@codesourcery.com \
--to=nathan@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox