Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Various build fixes for NetBSD

Kamil Rytarowski
2017-09-04T14:34:10Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1759 bytes --]

On 04.09.2017 16:01, Pedro Alves wrote:
>
> On 09/04/2017 02:04 PM, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>> On 04.09.2017 14:50, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 07/25/2017 05:50 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>> Relative to the first patch series: one patch has been committed,
>>>> the amd64 KVM support has been dropped, the _KMEMUSER #define was
>>>> moved earlier in bsd-kvm.o, and the x86 debug registers change was
>>>> expanded to also add needed object files in the NetBSD/x86 native
>>>> targets. I haven't been able to test remaining patches so am
>>>> waiting for testing reports from coypu@.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This hasn't been pushed yet, right?
>>> FWIW, it looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Pedro Alves
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> NetBSD patches are still pending. I'm going to readd NetBSD buildbot
>> after merging them.
>
> So, how to break the deadlock? Can you perhaps try applying the
> patches manually (or John could push them to some branch), and do some
> quick smoke testing just to be sure things aren't horribly broken?
> Otherwise, I'd be fine with just pushing them to master directly
> and if the new buildbot reveals breakage we can always back out the
> change.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>

I'm right now upstreaming pkgsrc patches to qemu. Once I will be done, I
will switch to gdb.

In general there are around 2 remaining build issues on NetBSD
(<sys/user.h> freebsdism and missing _KMEMUSER). In the past I was
demotivated by that ChangeLog format.

Long term, I'm still working on ptrace(2) correctness (appropriate
support for threads in tracee) and LLDB/NetBSD porting.. I expect to
allocate at some point time - when working on LLDB/kgdb - to improve GDB
support and resurrect execution of tests.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]