From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17571 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 08:43:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17563 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2006 08:43:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from potter.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:43:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 20138 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2006 08:43:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.189.145?) (nathan@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 13 Jun 2006 08:43:22 -0000 Message-ID: <448E7A7D.5090506@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:43:00 -0000 From: Nathan Sidwell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8 (X11/20060502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: Remote "qSupported" features probe References: <20060612195313.GA11276@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060612195313.GA11276@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00174.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Comments? Questions? Otherwise, I will plan to commit this in a week. > I haven't seen any objections to the latest version of the proposal, > although I'm somewhat suspicious that I've just talked everyone else > into the ground. Can you clarify something for me? If a stub recieves a 'qSupported:foo' packet, should it still respond with any default information it might have -- such as the PacketSize response? Or should such default responses only be sent for an unadorned qSupported packet? nathan -- Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery nathan@codesourcery.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk