From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29642 invoked by alias); 14 May 2006 17:09:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 29633 invoked by uid 22791); 14 May 2006 17:09:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from intranet.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 May 2006 17:09:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 11063 invoked from network); 14 May 2006 17:09:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.5?) (sandra@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 14 May 2006 17:09:25 -0000 Message-ID: <44676486.8090002@codesourcery.com> Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 19:44:00 -0000 From: Sandra Loosemore User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: copy-edit File-I/O section of manual References: <4465ED4D.4020505@codesourcery.com> <446659B7.3040306@codesourcery.com> <446730A4.60300@codesourcery.com> <4465ED4D.4020505@codesourcery.com> <446659B7.3040306@codesourcery.com> <20060514150059.GA29094@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060514150059.GA29094@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Shh... let's all take a deep breath, yes? Eli, I realize it will have > to wait until you can find the time, but could you look at Sandra's > revised text at some point? Better later than never. > Thanks, Daniel. On reflection, I think Eli and I are just thinking at cross-purposes here. Eli is worried about what has changed at a line-by-line level, while I have been thinking in terms of the "big picture" of bringing the writing in this section as a whole up to an acceptable standard of quality for a professional document. Are there other mistakes I may have missed or different formatting or font conventions that should be applied consistently throughout the section? That's why I suggested applying the patch and proofreading the resulting text. -Sandra