Re: PATCH: copy-edit File-I/O section of manual

[Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> Thanks.  However, could you please submit these as two separate
> patches, one that fixes only the spelling and grammar, the other with
> the rest? 

You're basically asking me to throw out the work I did and start over.  I don't 
think I'm motivated enough to want to do that.

 >  I'd like to understand the motivation for moving stuff
> around, for starters.

There were three pieces I moved around.  I moved the separate sections on the 
restrictions on isatty() and system() to the (respective) sections where the 
actual functions are documented, so that all the information is in one place 
instead of split in two different places.  The third piece was the section on 
memory access, which I moved to the "Protocol specific representation of 
datatypes" section.  Again, the motivation was to collect related information in 
one place.

> Also, when you send the patch for spelling and grammar, please try not
> to reformat lines, so that unmodified lines don't appear in the diffs.
> The way you did it (refilling the paragraphs after changing them)
> makes the diffs unnecessarily voluminous and hard to read.

I *did* avoid reformatting lines as much as possible.  However, there were a lot 
of lines that needed some sort of edit or another, even though many of the 
changes were very minor.  Rather than trying to make sense of the line-by-line 
diffs, I suggest that the right way to review this change is to apply them and 
proofread the resulting text.  If you spot additional problems, let me know and 
I can provide a revised patch to address them.

-Sandra