From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8710 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2006 18:50:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 8696 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Apr 2006 18:50:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:50:06 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3LIo3N4023144; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:50:03 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3LIo3hK008146; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:50:03 -0400 Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3LIo1Tq026253; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:50:02 -0400 Message-ID: <44492958.7080909@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:50:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Add missing Morpho coprocessor registers References: <200604190457.k3J4vwEt004545@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20060419152425.335b3c94@ironwood.lan> <20060419235113.GA30059@nevyn.them.org> <444813B7.6040901@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:05:27 -0700 >>From: Michael Snyder >>CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >>Should we mention the change in NEWS? > > > If the added feature is something to die for, then yes. But if > normally users don't care about these registers, then it isn't > important enough to be in NEWS. I was more thinking about the change in target architecture name, form ms1 to mt.