From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18110 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2006 18:59:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 18102 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2006 18:59:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k3IIxjpT030002; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:59:45 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k3IIxihg000500; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:59:44 -0400 Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k3IIxhTq025280; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:59:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4445371E.2070308@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:59:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [RFA] Reverse debugging, part 1/3: target interface References: <442DAA70.5070203@redhat.com> <444426C7.6020604@redhat.com> <20060418125836.GB10130@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060418125836.GB10130@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:37:43PM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>Two week ping... there having been no objections to this patch, >>shall I check it in? > > > For something this major, I think we should make sure someone else at > least looks over it first. I haven't had time, and I was hoping that > someone else would take the time; but if no one does, I will > definitely get to it soon. OK -- well if you have to budget your time, I would suggest that the parts in infrun and infcmd (part 2/3) could use review the most. >>>As a preface, there *is* an open-source target that will >>>support reverse execution, and will work with this patch. >>>A patch to the SID simulator exists in-house, and will >>>hopefully be ready for public submission "real soon now". > > > Any news on this, by the way? It'd be nice to play with it. > I'll have to see about getting it implemented in qemu... That'd be great! The guy who needs to submit the SID implementation is getting close to finishing the other project that's keeping him busy. I hope he'll be able to submit it soon. FYI, I've been using it to test gdb, and it works pretty darn well!