From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19616 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2006 19:44:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19608 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2006 19:44:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:44:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2AJi434007214; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:44:04 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2AJi4127429; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:44:04 -0500 Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2AJi2mG019411; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:44:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4411D701.80101@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:04:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Some more multi-fork fixes References: <20060115190757.GA10454@nevyn.them.org> <43DA7BFE.2070100@redhat.com> <20060224224115.GA6792@nevyn.them.org> <20060224230957.GA7834@nevyn.them.org> <4411CEF7.5040601@redhat.com> <20060310191651.GA29281@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20060310191651.GA29281@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:09:43AM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote: > >>Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> >>>On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:41:15PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm up against a bit of a brick wall at the moment. I've got >>>>patches in my source tree to unify the single-threaded and >>>>multi-threaded code in the Linux native layer into a single >>>>combined target. But since this is an inherently single-threaded >>>>operation the multi-threaded code totally falls down - switching >>>>forks doesn't preserve things like the LWP list, leading to >>>>messy timeouts. I'm going to find some minimally painful >>>>way to make the two of them talk to each other. >>> >>> >>>FYI, I've got that more or less working now (as well as it was >>>previously). I'll post it in a bit. >>> >> >>Hey Daniel, what's the status on this? > > > Sorry, didn't close the circle: I did post this. It's in these > two: > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00493.html > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-02/msg00494.html Ah, that's what I was looking for. > I've still got to work out the glibc side of the fourth patch > in that series, but I don't think there's anything stopping me > from committing the others; I should do that. Does the first > one above look good to you? Got some questions -- I'll reply in-thread.