From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16916 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2006 00:53:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 16908 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2006 00:53:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:53:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k220riwb007163; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:53:44 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k220rd102734; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:53:39 -0500 Received: from [172.16.24.50] (bluegiant.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k220rbKt032706; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 19:53:37 -0500 Message-ID: <44064210.60805@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:53:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kettenis CC: drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Fred Fish Subject: Re: RFA: Support Windows extended error numbers in safe_strerror References: <20060203215455.GA3501@nevyn.them.org> <200602032325.k13NPJ6g028001@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200602032325.k13NPJ6g028001@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00031.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > GDB is written for POSIX systems. Hmmmm, don't know about that. GDB was written for the Hurd. Even I don't go back that far, but Fred Fish does -- I see a Usenet post from Fred saying that he had version 1.1 of gdb back in January of '87. (Hey Fred -- any chance you've still got that? ) Posix was being whispered about at least as early as '86, but I don't think GNU was conceived as being Posix-compliant until way later (if at all).