From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26131 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2006 03:24:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 26117 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2006 03:24:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from voldemort.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:24:41 +0000 Received: (qmail 23166 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2006 03:24:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (mitchell@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 18 Jan 2006 03:24:40 -0000 Message-ID: <43CDB4EF.1040407@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:24:00 -0000 From: Mark Mitchell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: Remove rdi-share References: <200601162234.k0GMYHk7009713@sethra.codesourcery.com> <8f2776cb0601162147v597ba8d3ke75006a8ec11224d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0601162147v597ba8d3ke75006a8ec11224d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > On 1/16/06, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>As I understand it, consensus has been reached that rdi-share should >>go away. In addition to removing cruft, this also makes it possible >>to build an ARM GDB for MinGW; the rdi-share bits did not compile on >>Windows. I've tested this patch by building an arm-eabi GDB for both >>x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and i686-mingw32 hosts. > > Should there be a NEWS entry for this? I'm not sure what the criteria is -- but, in my local NEWS file, I now have: * REMOVED features The ARM rdi-share module. OK with that addition? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713