Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
To: Amit Kale <amitkale@linsyssoft.com>
Cc: GDB patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] preventing resuming of threads in gdbserver
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43C424D7.5040704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601101805.31069.amitkale@linsyssoft.com>

Amit Kale wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> gdb lets other threads continue execution during single stepping when doing a 
> single step in remote mode. This behavior causes thread switches during step 
> or next commands. Native mode behavior is opposite of it. Attached patch 
> changes it and makes it similar to native mode.

Actually, letting other threads continue during single stepping
is the norm.  It happens on almost all multi-thread gdb targets.

Indeed, if you don't allow it to happen, you're risking deadlock,
and certainly changing the program behavior.

Moreover, a patch that changes the behavior of *all* remote targets
is going to be challenging to get approved.



On the other hand, there is a user-setable mode variable
called "scheduler-locking", which is meant to have the exact
effect you are looking for.  If you wanted to re-do your patch
so that it made this change conditionally, under the control of
that variable, it might be more acceptable.


> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Index: gdb-cvs/gdb/remote.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gdb-cvs.orig/gdb/remote.c	2006-01-03 11:24:35.000000000 +0530
> +++ gdb-cvs/gdb/remote.c	2006-01-10 18:00:05.000000000 +0530
> @@ -2519,10 +2519,10 @@
>      {
>        /* Resume all threads, with preference for INFERIOR_PTID.  */
>        if (step && siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
> -	outbuf = xstrprintf ("vCont;S%02x:%x;c", siggnal,
> +	outbuf = xstrprintf ("vCont;S%02x:%x", siggnal,
>  			     PIDGET (inferior_ptid));
>        else if (step)
> -	outbuf = xstrprintf ("vCont;s:%x;c", PIDGET (inferior_ptid));
> +	outbuf = xstrprintf ("vCont;s:%x", PIDGET (inferior_ptid));
>        else if (siggnal != TARGET_SIGNAL_0)
>  	outbuf = xstrprintf ("vCont;C%02x:%x;c", siggnal,
>  			     PIDGET (inferior_ptid));



  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-10 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-10 12:35 Amit Kale
2006-01-10 21:20 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2006-01-10 21:39   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-11  7:35     ` Amit Kale
2006-01-11  7:17   ` Amit Kale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43C424D7.5040704@redhat.com \
    --to=msnyder@redhat.com \
    --cc=amitkale@linsyssoft.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox