From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22515 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2005 18:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 22498 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2005 18:38:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:38:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB7IclI3029291; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:38:47 -0500 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB7IcdV28579; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:38:39 -0500 Received: from [172.16.14.227] (IDENT:tEqMufQShMalZucrlPbZuT2kzB5K1Qve@topaz.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.227]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jB7Iccbs022165; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:38:38 -0500 Message-ID: <43972C2E.3020707@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 04:30:00 -0000 From: Dave Brolley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Sidwell CC: GCC Patches , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, Aldy Hernandez , nickc@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Rename ms1 arch to mt References: <4396FBAD.80003@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4396FBAD.80003@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 Nathan Sidwell wrote: > This patch does not rename the cgenerated opcodes files, as cgen > seemed unhappy about the mixture of mt target name but > bfd_ms1_arch_vec name. Clearly this patch is a bit of a flag day, and > I want to commit it before I proceed with tidying up the symbol names. Assuming that there will be a follow on patch which corrects the problem above, this patch is ok for the SID and opcodes portions. Dave