From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16286 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2005 09:43:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16279 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Dec 2005 09:43:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lon-del-02.spheriq.net (HELO lon-del-02.spheriq.net) (195.46.50.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:43:48 +0000 Received: from lon-out-01.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.129]) by lon-del-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jB59hjeu005387 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:43:45 GMT Received: from lon-cus-02.spheriq.net (lon-cus-02.spheriq.net [195.46.50.38]) by lon-out-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jB59hhoC026961 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:43:44 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by lon-cus-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jB59hfT5000388 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:43:43 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id EE6D1DA43; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:43:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics, from userid 60012) id ECFF44730E; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:46:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5FB82759AE; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.cro.st.com (mail1.cro.st.com [164.129.40.131]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 7658E47332; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:46:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from st.com (crx1177.cro.st.com [164.129.47.77]) by mail1.cro.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CGD54763 (AUTH "denis pilat"); Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:43:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43940BB8.6030307@st.com> Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 20:50:00 -0000 From: Denis PILAT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020920 Netscape/7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Roberts Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Target stderr not displayed thru MI References: <17293.36697.854192.691800@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <438DA1DE.2020406@st.com> <17294.2894.345752.773239@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <438F011F.7050403@st.com> <20051201140436.GA31759@white> <20051201143218.GB13069@nevyn.them.org> <17295.22919.290876.649298@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-O-Spoofed: Not Scanned X-O-General-Status: No X-O-Spam1-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Spam2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-URL-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus1-Status: No X-O-Virus2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus3-Status: No X-O-Virus4-Status: No X-O-Virus5-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Image-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Attach-Status: Not Scanned X-SpheriQ-Ver: 4.2.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2 Nick Roberts wrote: >DP> I'm not sticked to have one more MI stream today since nobody >DP> will use it efficiently, I just need to have at least target error >DP> reported to a stream, even if it's the only mi stream available (mi->targ). > >Since no-one else appears to need another MI stream, or possibly even use MI >for remote debugging, if we accept that adding a stream later may present >compatibility problems, his original patch seems appropriate. > > > Nick, Can I consider that my original patch (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2005-11/msg00497.html) is accepted ? Denis