Re: [RFA] Run follow-fork tests on Linux

Michael Snyder
2005-11-26T04:03:12Z

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> ... you are testing this on something close to HEAD, right? That
> shouldn't be printed unless "set debug linux-nat 1".

Right. In view of Mark's comment, which I assume you second,
that chunk can go. But it could as well stay, too, since it's
harmless and makes the test strings more consistant with one
another.

I can go either way.