From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12156 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2005 10:34:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 12147 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2005 10:34:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from lon-del-02.spheriq.net (HELO lon-del-02.spheriq.net) (195.46.50.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:27 +0000 Received: from lon-out-01.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.129]) by lon-del-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAOAYKsW028944 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:20 GMT Received: from lon-cus-02.spheriq.net (lon-cus-02.spheriq.net [195.46.50.38]) by lon-out-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAOAYIOH002614 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:19 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by lon-cus-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jAOAYFa7018258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:17 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id C9FACDA55; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics, from userid 60012) id DD7054733E; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:37:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 892D275995; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 1227747339; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:37:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.15.13] (terrorhawk.bri.st.com [164.129.15.13]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CGZ92634 (AUTH "andrew stubbs"); Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:34:07 GMT Message-ID: <43859673.8070107@st.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 'Undefined command' error message References: <20051116201300.GA23472@nevyn.them.org> <4382072A.1010402@st.com> <43849117.5030805@st.com> <4384BD74.1060600@st.com> <20051123191940.GA20765@nevyn.them.org> <20051123210732.GA22982@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-O-Spoofed: Not Scanned X-O-General-Status: No X-O-Spam1-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Spam2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-URL-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus1-Status: No X-O-Virus2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus3-Status: No X-O-Virus4-Status: No X-O-Virus5-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Image-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Attach-Status: Not Scanned X-SpheriQ-Ver: 4.2.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00444.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:07:32 -0500 >>From: Daniel Jacobowitz >>Cc: Andrew STUBBS , schwab@suse.de, >> gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com >> >>So if "u+1" returned 'unknown command "u+1"' instead, I think that >>would be an acceptable change, especially if it reduces some >>special-cases in the handling of commands. > > > Thanks. Yes, I agree with that. > > Andrew, does this resolve your doubt about how to go about this issue? > Yes, I think so. But just to comfirm, you are giving me permission to commit the patch as it is? Thanks Andrew