Re: [RFC] A better implementation of Checkpoint/Restart

[Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@virtutech.com>]

Michael Snyder wrote:
> Hi folk,

Hi Michael,

> The attached patch, again, is for discussion and review, not
> for approval or commit.  This patch adds a first-cut implementation
> of checkpoint and restart commands, based on fork instead of
> on corefiles.
> [...]
> I'd be thrilled if folks would try it out and comment.

I will try to get a few minutes over and try this little fella out, but
I have an initial question:

Would it be possible to make this a bit more generic, maybe by moving
it into the target vector?  That would make things easier for targets
which implement some kind of checkpointing mechanism their self.

Cheers,
Johan.