From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1002 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2005 17:06:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 957 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2005 17:06:33 -0000 Received: from lon-del-01.spheriq.net (HELO lon-del-01.spheriq.net) (195.46.50.97) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:06:33 +0000 Received: from lon-out-02.spheriq.net ([195.46.50.130]) by lon-del-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA1H5fof020921 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:05:43 GMT Received: from lon-cus-01.spheriq.net (lon-cus-01.spheriq.net [195.46.50.37]) by lon-out-02.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA1H5e0h024415 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:05:40 GMT Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by lon-cus-01.spheriq.net with ESMTP id jA1H5dvl017789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:05:39 GMT Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (ns2.st.com [164.129.230.9]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id BBD9CDA41; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:05:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics, from userid 60012) id B4F9047402; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:08:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 798F875969; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.bri.st.com (mail1.bri.st.com [164.129.8.218]) by zeta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 0FB89473B9; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:08:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [164.129.15.13] (terrorhawk.bri.st.com [164.129.15.13]) by mail1.bri.st.com (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CFE00381 (AUTH "andrew stubbs"); Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:05:36 GMT Message-ID: <43679FEA.9020506@st.com> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:06:00 -0000 From: Andrew STUBBS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Fix TUI null pointer dereference References: <43679E26.4080001@st.com> <20051101170146.GA31019@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051101170146.GA31019@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-O-Spoofed: Not Scanned X-O-General-Status: No X-O-Spam1-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Spam2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-URL-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus1-Status: No X-O-Virus2-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Virus3-Status: No X-O-Virus4-Status: No X-O-Virus5-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Image-Status: Not Scanned X-O-Attach-Status: Not Scanned X-SpheriQ-Ver: 4.1.07 X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:56:06PM +0000, Andrew STUBBS wrote: > >>Sorry I have not sent this before. I assumed the [commit] messages were >>just from people who had not previously posted a [patch]. > > > No problem. > > Normally [commit] is "I'm going to commit this". All I'm asking for is > a reply to the approval saying "I have now committed this". > > The point is just for bookkeeping; easier to keep track of which > approved patches have been checked in and which have been dropped, if > there's a commit message in the original thread. We've had some > problems in the past with approved patches being lost. > Sorry, I've now misundertood twice. Ah well, we live and learn.