From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8761 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2005 14:30:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8747 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2005 14:30:23 -0000 Received: from qnxmail.qnx.com (HELO nimbus.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:30:23 +0000 Received: from [10.42.102.103] (STIMPY [10.42.102.103]) by nimbus.ott.qnx.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id TX9QV1MP; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:30:21 -0400 Message-ID: <43414074.3010506@qnx.com> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:30:00 -0000 From: Kris Warkentin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] clean up potential memory leak in thread.c References: <433C21F1.9000903@qnx.com> <20051002201953.GA31820@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20051002201953.GA31820@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 We're throwing named thread support into the kernel so I'm keeping an arbitrary length string in there. Would never be a huge memory leak but I'm fussy that way. cheers, Kris Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote: > > Got rid of a 'FIXME' by implementing a target hook for cleaning up > > private thread info. Look kosher? > > I assume you have some target data that you need to get rid of for QNX? > Most other threaded targets have found a single struct sufficient, so > I'm mildly curious what you need. > > -- > Daniel Jacobowitz > CodeSourcery, LLC > -- Stay up-to-date on all the QNX news! Register at http://www.qnx.com/news/forms/newsletter.html to receive our newsletter.