From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22725 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 20:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22512 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2005 20:24:28 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:24:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j8NKOQ8i003048; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:24:26 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j8NKOQV24271; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:24:26 -0400 Received: from [172.16.14.227] (IDENT:GO/0qZ8Qy6jOPp4uKT7IzW6vqvm+p3pk@topaz.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.227]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j8NKOPoF022646; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:24:26 -0400 Message-ID: <43346479.80107@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:24:00 -0000 From: Dave Brolley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch][rfa] Representation of ISA Attribute in CGEN References: <4334492B.8070003@redhat.com> <20050923194006.GA8783@nevyn.them.org> In-Reply-To: <20050923194006.GA8783@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >MAINTAINERS says: > >cgen/; cgen parts of opcodes/, sim/ & include/ > cgen: http://sources.redhat.com/cgen/ > Patches to cgen@sources.redhat.com > May need separate opcodes/ or sim/ approval for > commits of regenerated files there. > >Is that list still alive? If so, asking there may be more useful. I >have no idea who can approve patches for cgen, but I think the gdb >maintainers won't. > > > Yes, thanks. I have submitted this patch for approval to cgen and sid separately. Dave