From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14729 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2005 07:42:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14245 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Sep 2005 07:40:25 -0000 Received: from public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com (HELO emea1-mh.id2.novell.com) (195.33.99.129) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:40:25 +0000 Received: from EMEA1-MTA by emea1-mh.id2.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:40:22 +0200 Message-Id: <4333BF700200007800005DCD@emea1-mh.id2.novell.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:42:00 -0000 From: "Jan Beulich" To: Cc: ,, Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 CFI extensions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2 >>> Mark Kettenis 09/21/05 10:02 PM >>> >This is ok. However, I don't see your name listed in gdb/MAINTAINERS. >Do you have a valid copyright assignment for GDB? >From all I can tell I do (for binutils, gcc, and gdb). I didn't care to add myself to gdb/MAINTAINERS, as there's really not a lot I'm currently doing with/for it specifically (binutils changes to opcodes/ certainly affect it, though). So, am are you OK with me going ahead and committing the patch? Jan