From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8506 invoked by alias); 14 May 2002 21:17:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8499 invoked from network); 14 May 2002 21:17:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2002 21:17:17 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA) with ESMTP id BKS73143; Wed, 15 May 2002 00:17:03 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 14:17:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: jimb@redhat.com Message-Id: <4331-Wed15May2002001548+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 14 May 2002 15:03:48 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: document macro support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20020513233504.BE1495EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020514065015.GA22717@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 14 May 2002 15:03:48 -0500 > > > Just a minor nit: in GCC, we're quite picky now about using > > @command and @option correctly. > > I didn't even know those directives existed! I'll read the texinfo > manual, and post a revised patch shortly. Jim, you are welcome to use those directives, now that we require Texinfo 4.0 or later, but AFAIK there's no policy in GDB to disallow use of their older equivalents. Your docs patch is approved. Sorry I didn't do that before, we had a nasty problem with our mail server down here, so I never knew about your original message until now (had to catch up via list archives).